Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±Ù°ü ÃæÀü¿ë MTAÀÇ ¹ÐÆó È¿°ú¿Í ÀÛ¾÷ ½Ã°£ Æò°¡

Evaluation of Sealing Effect and Working Time of Root Canal Filling MTA Materials

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2016³â 43±Ç 2È£ p.129 ~ 136
±èÈ¿Áø, ±è¿µÁø, ³²¼øÇö, ±ÇÅ¿±, ±èÇöÁ¤,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÈ¿Áø ( Kim Hyo-Jin ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±è¿µÁø ( Kim Young-Jin ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
³²¼øÇö ( Nam Soon-Hyeun ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±ÇÅ¿± ( Kwon Tae-Yub ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±èÇöÁ¤ ( Kim Hyun-Jung ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ±Ù°ü ÃæÀüÀç·Î¼­ MTA(Endoseal, Endoseal MTA)ÀÇ ¹ÐÆó È¿°ú¿Í È¿À²À» Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ÃÑ 106°³ÀÇ ¹ß°ÅµÈ ´Ü±ÙÄ¡°¡ »ç¿ëµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ÃæÀüµÈ ½Ç·¯¿¡ µû¶ó AH±º(AH-26), PR±º(ProRoot MTA), ES±º (Endoseal), EM±º(Endoseal MTA)À¸·Î ³ª´©¾îÁ³°í, ¸ðµç ÃæÀü½Ã ¼Ò¿ä ½Ã°£ÀÌ ÃøÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. ±× ±ºµéÀº ´Ù½Ã A ÇÏÀ§±º, BÇÏÀ§±ºÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾î ±Ù°üº®°úÀÇ ¹ÐÆ󼺰ú »ó¾Æ¼¼°ü³» ½Ç·¯ÀÇ Ä§Åõµµ¸¦ °¢°¢ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °á°ú´Â ±Ù°ü ÃæÀü¿ë MTA´Â AH-26¿¡ ºñÇØ ±Ù°üº®°úÀÇ ¹ÐÆ󼺰ú »ó¾Æ¼¼°ü ħÅõµµ´Â ¶³¾îÁ³À¸¸ç, ProRoot MTA¿Í ºñ±³ ½Ã ±Ù°üº®°úÀÇ ¹ÐÆó¼ºÀº Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾úÁö¸¸, »ó¾Æ¼¼°ü ħÅõµµ´Â ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ÀÛ¾÷ ½Ã°£Àº ±Ù°ü ÃæÀü¿ë MTA°¡ ProRoot MTA¿Í AH-26¿¡ ºñÇØ Âª¾Ò´Ù. °á·ÐÀûÀ¸·Î ±Ù°ü ÃæÀü¿ë MTA´Â ·¹Áø°è ½Ç·¯º¸´Ù ±Ù°ü ¹ÐÆó È¿°ú´Â ¶³¾îÁöÁö¸¸ MTA°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ±Ù°ü ÃæÀü½Ã È¿°úÀûÀÎ ´ë¾ÈÀÌ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.

The purpose of this study is to examine the sealing effect and efficiency of root canal filling MTA (Endoseal, Endoseal MTA). A total of 106 extracted single rooted teeth were used and classified with group AH (AH-26), group PR (ProRoot MTA), group ES (Endoseal) and group EM (Endoseal MTA) depending on filled sealers. Time was measured in each group when sealers were filled. The groups were divided into subgroup A and subgroup B. The sealing of root canal walls and penetration of sealer in the dentinal tubule were evaluated, respectively. According to the results, the sealing of root canal walls and dentinal tubule penetration of root canal filling MTA were inferior to AH-26 (p < 0.05). When compared with ProRoot MTA, however, there was no significant difference in sealing of root canal walls (p > 0.05), but dentinal tubule penetration was high (p < 0.05). Working time was shorter in root canal filling MTA than ProRoot MTA and AH-26 (p < 0.05). In conclusion, root canal filling MTA has lower root canal sealing effect than resin-based sealer, however, when in MTA needed root canal filling, it could be an effective alternative.

Å°¿öµå

MTA; ¿°·á ´©Ãâ; ½Ç·¯ ħÅõ; ½Ã°£
Mineral trioxide aggregate; Dye leakage; Sealer penetration; Time

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI